Bug/problem reports for any of the GYRE executables (gyre_ad, gyre_nad, etc)
-
rhtownsend
- Site Admin
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:22 pm
Post
by rhtownsend » Sat Oct 14, 2017 9:34 am
gali8292 wrote:
Hi Rich,
I tried. It should be 'freq_frame', not 'freq_min_frame' even in the last GYRE version 5.1 . Can you check it?
Cheers
Li
You're right -- apologies for the confusion!
Do your calculations now work OK? Looking through your inlist, you might want to consider uncommenting the parameters in the &grid namelist; otherwise, you may be under-resolving modes on the spatial grid.
cheers,
Rich
-
gali8292
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 7:05 pm
Post
by gali8292 » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:11 pm
rhtownsend wrote:gali8292 wrote:
Hi Rich,
I tried. It should be 'freq_frame', not 'freq_min_frame' even in the last GYRE version 5.1 . Can you check it?
Cheers
Li
You're right -- apologies for the confusion!
Do your calculations now work OK? Looking through your inlist, you might want to consider uncommenting the parameters in the &grid namelist; otherwise, you may be under-resolving modes on the spatial grid.
cheers,
Rich
Hi Rich,
Many thanks. Do you mean these two parameters?
!alpha_osc=10 ! ensure at least 10 points per wavelength in propagation regions
!alpha_exp=2 ! ensure at least 2 points per scale length in evanescent regions
I encountered another problem. GYRE reports some different frequencies with same radial orders. Is it right?
Cheers
Li
-
rhtownsend
- Site Admin
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:22 pm
Post
by rhtownsend » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:14 pm
gali8292 wrote:rhtownsend wrote:gali8292 wrote:
Hi Rich,
I tried. It should be 'freq_frame', not 'freq_min_frame' even in the last GYRE version 5.1 . Can you check it?
Cheers
Li
You're right -- apologies for the confusion!
Do your calculations now work OK? Looking through your inlist, you might want to consider uncommenting the parameters in the &grid namelist; otherwise, you may be under-resolving modes on the spatial grid.
cheers,
Rich
Hi Rich,
Many thanks. Do you mean these two parameters?
!alpha_osc=10 ! ensure at least 10 points per wavelength in propagation regions
!alpha_exp=2 ! ensure at least 2 points per scale length in evanescent regions
I encountered another problem. GYRE reports some different frequencies with same radial orders. Is it right?
Cheers
Li
Yes, I mean those parameters. If you uncomment them, you may be able to fix the issue with different modes having the same radial order (since this issue typically arises when the mode eigenfunctions are not properly resolved on the spatial grid).
cheers,
Rich
-
gali8292
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 7:05 pm
Post
by gali8292 » Tue Oct 17, 2017 7:19 pm
rhtownsend wrote:gali8292 wrote:rhtownsend wrote:
You're right -- apologies for the confusion!
Do your calculations now work OK? Looking through your inlist, you might want to consider uncommenting the parameters in the &grid namelist; otherwise, you may be under-resolving modes on the spatial grid.
cheers,
Rich
Hi Rich,
Many thanks. Do you mean these two parameters?
!alpha_osc=10 ! ensure at least 10 points per wavelength in propagation regions
!alpha_exp=2 ! ensure at least 2 points per scale length in evanescent regions
I encountered another problem. GYRE reports some different frequencies with same radial orders. Is it right?
Cheers
Li
Yes, I mean those parameters. If you uncomment them, you may be able to fix the issue with different modes having the same radial order (since this issue typically arises when the mode eigenfunctions are not properly resolved on the spatial grid).
cheers,
Rich
Hi Rich,
Many thanks. It looks like all good now!
I still feel confused on frame transfer. Considering a frequency f in co-rotating frame, what will happen if f-m*rotation < 0? I mean, in real physics and in GYRE code?
Cheers
Li
Li
