Search found 397 matches

by rhtownsend
Mon Nov 29, 2021 2:38 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: possible to model observed non-monotonic rotation profile?
Replies: 2
Views: 1670

Re: possible to model observed non-monotonic rotation profile?

Hi Rich et al., Quick question: is it possible to hand GYRE, or build within GYRE, initial conditions that have a non-monotonic rotation profile (e.g. a measured surface rotation rate than exceeds an internal subsurface rotation rate)? My assumption is no (and how would one produce that in MESA, an...
by rhtownsend
Tue Jun 01, 2021 9:10 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Lower asymptotic period spacing than expected
Replies: 12
Views: 4420

Re: Lower asymptotic period spacing than expected

I would advise against modifying any code -- post-processing is the right way to go.

cheers,

Rich
by rhtownsend
Mon May 31, 2021 7:34 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Lower asymptotic period spacing than expected
Replies: 12
Views: 4420

Re: Lower asymptotic period spacing than expected

Hi Rich, I returned to this problem because I find this behaviour in other calculations. Again I found Deltag values quite lower than expected. So I write the N on the MESA file and proceed to compute "by hand" the intergral to obtain the value of the asimptotic period spacing with the Tassoul form...
by rhtownsend
Wed May 05, 2021 11:04 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Lower asymptotic period spacing than expected
Replies: 12
Views: 4420

Re: Lower asymptotic period spacing than expected

OK, thanks for checking that out!

But I still think this behavior is physical -- see, e.g., Miglio et al. (2008, MNRAS, 386, 1487), especially their Fig. 4.

cheers,

Rich
by rhtownsend
Wed May 05, 2021 8:26 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Lower asymptotic period spacing than expected
Replies: 12
Views: 4420

Re: Lower asymptotic period spacing than expected

Hi Francisco -- At first, I thought there may be an issue with your input file -- but that looks fine. On further consideration, I think the result you are finding for the period spaceings looks correct. Your model star shows a period spacing with regular dips -- this is the symptom of mixed modes, ...
by rhtownsend
Tue May 04, 2021 7:57 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Lower asymptotic period spacing than expected
Replies: 12
Views: 4420

Re: Lower asymptotic period spacing than expected

Hi Francisco --

Welcome to the forum! As a first suggestion, can you post the namelist input file you use for GYRE?

cheers,

Rich
by rhtownsend
Fri Apr 09, 2021 9:26 am
Forum: Bug reports
Topic: GYRE 6.0 libgomp issues?
Replies: 6
Views: 3002

Re: GYRE 6.0 libgomp issues?

yup that worked, thanks! I do note that eta is listed as a valid output option at https://gyre.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ref-guide/output-files/summary-files.html#only-n without warning that this is a nad parameter only, but perhaps a more informed user/real asteroseismologist would recognize that t...
by rhtownsend
Thu Apr 08, 2021 7:44 am
Forum: Bug reports
Topic: GYRE 6.0 libgomp issues?
Replies: 6
Views: 3002

Re: GYRE 6.0 libgomp issues?

Thanks. It appears the crash arises from requesting 'eta' as one of the adiabatic summary-file items -- for adiabatic calculations, this quantity (the Stellingwerf normalized growth rate) is undefined. So, as a workaround, remove 'eta' from the summary_item_list in &ad_output. I'll also be working o...
by rhtownsend
Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:57 am
Forum: Bug reports
Topic: GYRE 6.0 libgomp issues?
Replies: 6
Views: 3002

Re: GYRE 6.0 libgomp issues?

Hi Meridith --

The input file you sent me still has a number of template fields -- e.g., <<freq_min>>. Can you send an example with these filled in (pref. the crashing example).

cheers,

Rich
by rhtownsend
Fri Feb 12, 2021 7:39 am
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: {M,R,L}_star reported for every mode in summary
Replies: 2
Views: 3442

Re: {M,R,L}_star reported for every mode in summary

Hi Warrick --

This is in fact a design choice; although GYRE currently only works with a single stellar model at a time, the output code can support multiple models. Hence, I decided it made more sense to have {M,R,L} be arrays.

cheers,

Rich