Thanks for the info, Thomas. My suspicion is that the problem lies with the HDF5 library that ships with the SDK, rather than with GYRE. So, I'm not sure there's much that can be done at my end.
cheers,
Rich
Search found 397 matches
- Sun Feb 07, 2021 1:42 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: HDF5 file locking errors
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6986
- Sun Jan 03, 2021 5:34 pm
- Forum: GYRE News
- Topic: GYRE 6.0.1 release
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5427
GYRE 6.0.1 release
Hi folks -- I'm pleased to announce the release of GYRE 6.0.1, which provides a performance improvement to the TAR code plus some documentation tweaks. Source code: https://github.com/rhdtownsend/gyre/archive/v6.0.1.tar.gz Release notes: https://github.com/rhdtownsend/gyre/releases/tag/v6.0.1 Docume...
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:37 pm
- Forum: GYRE News
- Topic: GYRE 6.0 release
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5258
GYRE 6.0 release
Hi folks -- I'm pleased to announce the release of GYRE 6.0. New features are described in the release notes, which can be found at: https://github.com/rhdtownsend/gyre/releases/tag/v6.0 (note the migration to GitHub!). The source code is available at: https://github.com/rhdtownsend/gyre/archive/v6....
- Mon Nov 23, 2020 11:38 pm
- Forum: GYRE News
- Topic: Getting ready for the GYRE 6.0 release...
- Replies: 0
- Views: 4996
Getting ready for the GYRE 6.0 release...
Hi folks -- I've been relatively silent over the past couple of years, but nevertheless quite busy. I'm planning to push out the next major release of GYRE at the end of the month, and I'd like to hear any last-minute bug reports or showstoppers before I do so. GYRE now lives on github, and (assumin...
- Wed Aug 19, 2020 10:58 am
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: GYRE docs permanently down? "Bitbucket no longer supports Mercurial repositories."
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4057
Re: GYRE docs permanently down? "Bitbucket no longer supports Mercurial repositories."
Oh dear, looks like Bitbucket finally made good on their threat!
This gives me impetus to roll out the new docs. I'll see what I can do this week.
cheers,
Rich
This gives me impetus to roll out the new docs. I'll see what I can do this week.
cheers,
Rich
- Sun Jun 07, 2020 7:00 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: fundamental mode
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5934
Re: fundamental mode
Hi Meridith -- Thanks for the clarification! For the record, n_p counts the number of wavefunction nodes in acoustic propagation zones, and n_g the corresponding number of nodes in gravity-wave propagation zones. These countings neglect any node at the center, *except* for radial modes where the cen...
- Thu Jun 04, 2020 9:45 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: fundamental mode
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5934
Re: fundamental mode
Hi Meridith --
Thanks for your question. Can you give a specific example of GYRE labeling the FM as n=0? Because I don't think it does!
cheers,
Rich
Thanks for your question. Can you give a specific example of GYRE labeling the FM as n=0? Because I don't think it does!
cheers,
Rich
- Mon May 18, 2020 8:33 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: meaning of failure to produce any output
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3807
Re: meaning of failure to produce any output
Yep, that's right!
cheers,
Rich
cheers,
Rich
- Mon Apr 27, 2020 10:06 am
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: bugs in GYRE 5.2 with .OSC files and non-adiabatic eigenfunctions
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6512
Re: bugs in GYRE 5.2 with .OSC files and non-adiabatic eigenfunctions
Hi Lionel --
As a final note, the patch should also fix the lag_P /= 0 issue when you use the VACUUM boundary condition.
cheers,
Rich
As a final note, the patch should also fix the lag_P /= 0 issue when you use the VACUUM boundary condition.
cheers,
Rich
- Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:41 am
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: bugs in GYRE 5.2 with .OSC files and non-adiabatic eigenfunctions
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6512
Re: bugs in GYRE 5.2 with .OSC files and non-adiabatic eigenfunctions
Hi Lionel -- For your questions about the different variables_set choices, I think you've run into a known bug in GYRE 5.2. To fix it, please try applying the patch posted in this thread: http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~townsend/gyre-forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=221 Regarding the different numerical values...