The GYRE Forums

Thanks for the info, Thomas. My suspicion is that the problem lies with the HDF5 library that ships with the SDK, rather than with GYRE. So, I'm not sure there's much that can be done at my end.

cheers,

Rich

Hi folks -- I'm pleased to announce the release of GYRE 6.0.1, which provides a performance improvement to the TAR code plus some documentation tweaks. Source code: https://github.com/rhdtownsend/gyre/archive/v6.0.1.tar.gz Release notes: https://github.com/rhdtownsend/gyre/releases/tag/v6.0.1 Docume...

Hi folks -- I'm pleased to announce the release of GYRE 6.0. New features are described in the release notes, which can be found at: https://github.com/rhdtownsend/gyre/releases/tag/v6.0 (note the migration to GitHub!). The source code is available at: https://github.com/rhdtownsend/gyre/archive/v6....

Hi folks -- I've been relatively silent over the past couple of years, but nevertheless quite busy. I'm planning to push out the next major release of GYRE at the end of the month, and I'd like to hear any last-minute bug reports or showstoppers before I do so. GYRE now lives on github, and (assumin...

Oh dear, looks like Bitbucket finally made good on their threat!

This gives me impetus to roll out the new docs. I'll see what I can do this week.

cheers,

Rich

Hi Meridith -- Thanks for the clarification! For the record, n_p counts the number of wavefunction nodes in acoustic propagation zones, and n_g the corresponding number of nodes in gravity-wave propagation zones. These countings neglect any node at the center, *except* for radial modes where the cen...

Hi Meridith --

Thanks for your question. Can you give a specific example of GYRE labeling the FM as n=0? Because I don't think it does!

cheers,

Rich

Yep, that's right!

cheers,

Rich

Hi Lionel --

As a final note, the patch should also fix the lag_P /= 0 issue when you use the VACUUM boundary condition.

cheers,

Rich

Hi Lionel -- For your questions about the different variables_set choices, I think you've run into a known bug in GYRE 5.2. To fix it, please try applying the patch posted in this thread: http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~townsend/gyre-forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=221 Regarding the different numerical values...